Join us as a Seller How to Analyse AQA Psychology Mark Schemes Like an Examiner (Humanisti – Yum Yum Mama

How to Analyse AQA Psychology Mark Schemes Like an Examiner (Humanistic Approach Example)

Introduction

If you want to move from a B to an A or A* in AQA Psychology, analysing the mark scheme like an examiner is one of the most powerful skills you can learn. Surprisingly, most students never look at the mark scheme properly — they only check the grade boundaries, glance at the answers, or skip the document entirely.

But AQA’s mark schemes actually tell you:

  • what is creditworthy

  • what examiners reward the most

  • common mistakes students make

  • what counts as AO1 vs AO3

  • how clarity and structure affect final marks

  • what “sound analysis” and “effective evaluation” really mean

In this guide, you’ll learn how to use the mark scheme effectively — using the Humanistic Approach 16-marker as the demonstration.


1. Start by Identifying the Command Word

AQA typically uses:

  • Discuss

  • Outline and evaluate

  • Evaluate

  • Apply

For 16-mark questions, Discuss often means:

  • AO1 = ~6 marks

  • AO3 = ~10 marks

When you read the mark scheme, look for the phrase:

👉 “Credit appropriate knowledge and understanding (AO1) and appropriate evaluative commentary (AO3).”

This tells you what examiners are actively looking for.


2. Pull Out the AO1 Requirements

To understand what the examiner expects, use the mark scheme like a checklist:

For the Humanistic Approach, AO1 requires students to show understanding of:

  • free will

  • self-actualisation

  • Maslow’s hierarchy

  • unconditional positive regard

  • congruence

  • person-centred therapy

If your essay misses even one of these, your AO1 is weakened.

Tip: Compare your AO1 to an A* example.

👉 Free A* Humanistic Essay (PDF)

Ask yourself:

  • Did I define everything clearly?

  • Did I link the concepts together?

  • Did I explain the aim of PCT?

This is exactly how examiners mark.


3. Look for the AO3 Expectations

AQA mark schemes include phrases like:

  • “effective use of evidence”

  • “appropriate breadth and depth”

  • “coherent chains of reasoning”

  • “clear use of counterargument”

These are usually found under Level 4 AO3 descriptors.

This is why students who “list strengths and weaknesses” get stuck at Level 2 or 3.

Mark schemes want structured evaluation, not scattered points.

This is where your PBWC structure comes in:

  • Point

  • Because

  • Why (using research)

  • Counterargument

If your paragraph includes all four, you hit Level 4.

This is how examiners judge quality.


4. Match Your Paragraphs to Level Descriptors

Examiners mark holistically, not point-by-point.

Here’s an example using the Humanistic Approach:

Level 4 AO3 descriptors include:

  • sustained critical evaluation

  • effective use of evidence

  • clear chains of reasoning

  • well-organised paragraph structure

Your Humanistic A* example includes:

  • Harter (1996) for conditional regard

  • Elliot (2002) for PCT effectiveness

  • Eysenck (1991) on lack of scientific method

  • Nevis (1983) on cultural variation

Each study directly supports a part of the argument.

When your evaluation matches the Level 4 pattern, examiners reward it.


5. Compare Your Timing to the Mark Scheme

Mark schemes assume:

  • ~6 minutes AO1

  • ~14 minutes AO3

  • ~2 minutes checking

If your AO1 is too long, your AO3 will suffer.
If AO3 is rushed, your chain of reasoning breaks.

Using the mark scheme to guide timing prevents this.


6. Use Mark Schemes to Identify Common Traps

Mark schemes repeatedly highlight:

❌ “generic evaluation”
❌ “assertions without evidence”
❌ “meaningless statements”
❌ “misunderstanding of concepts”
❌ “poor organisation”

For the Humanistic Approach specifically, students often:

  • confuse self-concept with ideal self

  • misunderstand hierarchy of needs

  • incorrectly explain self-actualisation

  • forget cultural bias concerns

  • forget client-centred therapy features

Mark scheme analysis fixes these instantly.


7. Rewrite the Weakest Part of Your Answer

This is the secret examiners wish students knew.

When you use the mark scheme to find your weakest area:

  • Rewrite only that paragraph

  • Use PBWC

  • Add one study

  • Make your counterargument relevant

  • Link back to the hook

This transforms your AO3 in less than 10 minutes.

If you want a clean space to practise:

👉 Use the A5 Approaches Notebook

Perfect for one-paragraph improvement drills.


8. Analyse Past Papers Monthly

You don’t need to write a full past paper.
You need to analyse one.

Steps:

  1. Find a Paper 1 or Paper 2

  2. Identify topics tested

  3. Check AO1 expectations

  4. Check AO3 expectations

  5. Rewrite the hardest question only

This is how students improve rapidly without burnout.


Conclusion

Examiners don’t reward long essays.
They reward:

✔ clarity
✔ accuracy
✔ strong AO1
✔ structured AO3
✔ evidence
✔ counterarguments
✔ linkbacks to the question

Using the mark scheme properly is the easiest way to upgrade your answers to A/A* standard.

Start by analysing one question today — and use the Humanistic example to guide your structure.